• Critical-Hits Studios
    • Criminals Card Game
    • Sentinel Comics: the Roleplaying Game
  • Downloads & Tools
    • Critical Hits Fantasy Name Generator
    • Drinking D&D 2010
    • Drinking D&D 2011
    • Fiasco Playset: “Alma Monster”
    • MODOK’s 11 for Marvel Heroic Roleplaying
    • Refuge In Audacity RPG
    • Strange New Worlds RPG
  • Guides
    • Gamma World
    • Guide to 4e Accessories
    • Guide to Gaming DVDs
    • Skill Challenges
  • RSS Feed
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Critical Hits

Everything tabletop gaming since 2005

  • News
  • Reviews
  • Columns
    • Dire Flailings
    • Dungeonomics
    • Musings of the Chatty DM
    • Pain of Publication
    • The Architect DM
  • Podcasts
    • Critical Hits Podcast
    • Dungeon Master Guys Podcast
  • Roleplaying Games
  • Tabletop Games
  • Game Hacks & Content
  • Video Games

Inq. of the Week: A Whole Lot of Class?

February 22, 2010 by Bartoneus

Our previous inquisition talked about the game Dragon Age and its impact and inspiration on DMs as well as asking which character origins you’ve played in the game. I personally haven’t played the game yet, and it looks like 24% of you are there with me but I certainly plan on playing it once I get the chance. The Human Noble Warrior origin came out in a narrow lead with 28%, followed by Human Noble Rogue tied with Elf Magi Mage at 26%. Behind them was Human Magi Mage at 21% with Elf City Rogue and Dwarf Noble Warrior tied behind that at 18%. The least popular origins were Elf City Warrior at 6% and Dwarf Noble Rogue at 5%.

Martial Power 2 comes out tomorrow, and having gotten a look at the book I am very disappointed that my current party does not have any martial classes at all out of eight players, not even through multi-classing. This passed weekend I had the opportunity to run an adventure of Dave’s game while he was out of town and really enjoyed seeing the Fighter class in action for the first time as a DM. All of this has led me to wondering exactly which classes all of you are playing and as a result which classes are the most played and which don’t get that much love. This becomes even more interesting when you think about the fact that the Player’s Handbook 3 is coming out in about a month and will introduce six new classes to the game. Since there are playtests available for a few of those classes I’ll include them in this week’s inquisition.

[poll id=”156″]

I’ve been running my D&D campaign since 4th Edition first came out, and haven’t played a regular character more than once. The few times I have played, however, I’ve played a barbarian in Dave’s game, a cleric in Phil’s Drinking D&D adventure at GenCon 2008, a druid in a delve at GenCon last year, and a ranger in E’s Eberron game. I’ve actually really enjoyed playing each one of those classes, and hopefully I’ll have a chance soon to play in some ongoing games (including playing in E’s Eberron game more) to explore the classes a bit more than I have at this point. Certainly the poll is based off of 4th Edition classes, but if you’re playing a class in a different edition please feel free to vote and share in the comments what you’re playing!

Share This:

  • Tweet
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Email
  • Print

Filed Under: Featured, Inquisition of the Week, Roleplaying Games Tagged With: 4th Edition, class, D&D, dnd 4e, Dungeons and Dragons, martial power 2, PHB3, roleplaying games, Roleplaying Games

Comments

  1. Wyatt Salazar says

    February 22, 2010 at 2:30 pm

    I’m a curse to 4e games. They tend to implode shortly after I join, or be destined to implode because I was there from the start. I’ve played a Fighter and an Artificer briefly (I was mostly the DM). I really would like to get to play a Whirling Barbarian or that quirky weapon-switching Fighter. Or a bowlord. Or a rogue. Generally something martial.
    .-= Wyatt Salazar´s last blog ..NAA D6: Character Creation =-.

  2. Justin Kutch says

    February 22, 2010 at 3:00 pm

    This is an interesting poll, cant wait to see how it turns out! My Other vote was for playing a Hybrid Class!

  3. Kameron says

    February 22, 2010 at 3:02 pm

    I’m playing a cleric in a 4E side adventure my group is running before we continue with the main campaign the I DM (another players is DMing the side adventure). I played a paladin in a short-lived game with some of the same folks (different DM) before we started our current campaign, and got to play a ranger as a second PC for a couple sessions while we transitioned between players. I’d like to play a rogue, my favorite class, and have a concept for a warlord.
    .-= Kameron´s last blog ..Nature’s lore =-.

  4. The Key of E says

    February 22, 2010 at 3:23 pm

    I’m currently the DM of my game. I marked that option, but also marked the classes of all my players. That would be swordmage, bard, sorcerer (we like arcane, apparently), barbarian (formerly rogue), ranger, and cleric.

    I also marked paladin, which was my first 4E character, and avenger which is the character I want to play if I’m ever a player again.

    I’m not surprised no one is playing the PHB 3 classes yet (since it doesn’t come out until next month), but I was surprised by no love for the avenger, druid, and shaman.

  5. Bartoneus says

    February 22, 2010 at 9:21 pm

    Wyatt: If you’re ever in the area, you’re welcome to stop by for my game! 🙂

    Justin: I’d actually just vote for whichever two classes you’re a hybrid in, same goes for multiclassing too if you feel it fits go ahead and vote for both classes in the poll.

    Kameron: and eventually you’ll try out the PHB2 and beyond classes, right? I can understand sticking to PHB classes as they seem a bit less specialized and possibly more well-rounded than the later classes.

    Key of E: That’s great, I’d definitely encourage DMs to vote for the classes that are in their game if your players don’t read us and won’t end up voting in the poll. As for the PHB3 classes you can use the playtest for all but the Runepriest in Dragon magazine, so that’s why they’re in the poll and already have some votes but I fully expect them to be in the lower minority of classes played at this point.

  6. Tarrl says

    February 23, 2010 at 12:56 am

    I am playing a hybrid Drow fighter/ranger. A lot of fun to play.

  7. Milly says

    February 23, 2010 at 6:52 am

    I’ve played a cleric for the past year, and loved it. But there’s just so little extra cleric content from Dragon, it’s rather disappointing – especially compared to the striker classes. Damn warlocks. The only decent option expansion we’ve gotten is Divine Power, which was amazing, but something between books would be nice too… maybe I’m just grouchy because my party’s warlock is a very annoying tiefling.

    If my cleric dies, I think I’ll create a warlord, or warlord/fighter. We have no martial characters either, it’s a bit sad.

  8. TheMainEvent says

    February 24, 2010 at 10:12 am

    Man, amongst the PHB2 classes Invoker and Shaman really get no love? I wonder if its a fluff or mechanical issue. The shaman in our game gets pretty bored with his action in combat and has started to control our Imp-monster follower as well.

  9. pworthen says

    February 24, 2010 at 2:09 pm

    I’m the DM right now. The group I’m DMing for is: cleric, paladin, fighter, wizard, ranger, warlord. We started this campaign right after the PHB1 came out, and we’re just picking it back up after a long hiatus.

    I’m really shocked that Invoker is so low – even lower than Assassin, which is a DDi exclusive class. We had an invoker in the last campaign I played in, and he was amazingly effective. Very good buff/debuff class.

  10. Starwind1985 says

    February 25, 2010 at 7:42 pm

    Our group plays pathfinder/3.5 and currently we have a rouge/sorcerer/shadowdancer, a ninja/ranger, a fighter, a mystic thurge, a scout/wilder/shadowmind, a ranger/scout, a ranger/arcane archer, a fighter/cleric, and a sorcerer. Yes we have a large group with alot of multiclassing and overlap.

  11. Ben Morris says

    February 27, 2010 at 12:42 am

    I’m glad I’m not the only DM taking a break and getting his groove on. My party started with 4 players and they generated them just from the phb1. I wanted to keep things as close to how they were intended (stat arrays for the first time, only wizards of the coast products, since i found in other editions they are much more balanced) and the group consisted of a human ranger, half-elf paladin, dwarf cleric, eladrin warlock. The group did pretty good, but i needed a break, and when we hit paragon tier, the paladin bowed out and I began playing a drow rogue (dread fang). The last night we played, the warlock used mire of the mind, so i was invisible to a mean troglodyte elite, and I hit with 2 powers (action point). First hit got sneak attack, did 39 points of damage. action point for fang and web strike (two attack power) first swing off that was with my handcrossbow, and I got sneak again (thanks to dread fang) and did 45 points of damage. The second swing from that power was a critical, ended up being 44 points, and one feat i have gives me a free ranged basic attack if i crit and have a hand crossbow in my off hand, which hit and did 13 points. 141 total, we are level 11. So yeah, why don’t more people play martial classes? And my stealth modifier makes my dm shake his head. Alot. And yes, I killed that which i hit. Obliterated him, really.

About the Author

  • Bartoneus

    Danny works professionally as an architectural designer and serves as managing editor here at CH, which means he shares many of the duties of being an editor but without the fame and recognition. He also writes about RPGs, videogames, movies, and TV. He is married to Sucilaria, and has a personal blog at Incorrect Blitz Input. (Email Danny or follow him on Twitter).

    Email: bartoneus@critical-hits.comWeb: https://critical-hits.com//author/Bartoneus/

    Follow me:

Subscribe

RSS Feed

Archives

CC License

All articles and comments posted posted on the site (but not the products for sale) are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. References to trademarks and copywritten material are included for review and commentary use only and are not intended as any kind of challenge.

Recent Comments

  • fogus: The best things and stuff of 2024 on Remembering the Master: An Inelegant Eulogy for Kory Heath
  • Routinely Itemised: RPGs #145 on Review: The Magus
  • The Chatty DM on Review: The Magus
  • Linnaeus on Review: The Magus
  • 13th Age: Indexing Truths — Critical Hits on The Horizon Conspiracy

Contact The Staff

Critical Hits staff can be reached via the contact information on their individual staff pages and in their articles. If you want to reach our senior staff, email staff @ critical-hits.com. We get sent a lot of email, so we can't promise we'll be able to respond to everything.

Recent Posts

  • Remembering the Master: An Inelegant Eulogy for Kory Heath
  • Review: The Magus
  • Hope in the Dark Heart of Evil is Not a Plan
  • Chatty on Games #1: Dorf Romantik
  • The Infinity Current: Adventure 0

Top Posts & Pages

  • Home
  • The 5x5 Method Compendium
  • Dungeons & Dragons "Monster Manual" Preview: The Bulette!
  • Critical Hits Fantasy Name Generator
  • On Mid-Medieval Economics, Murder Hoboing and 100gp
  • "The Eversink Post Office" - An Unofficial Supplement for Swords of the Serpentine
  • Finally a manual for the rest of them!
  • Dave Chalker AKA Dave The Game
  • How to Compare Birds to Fish
  • The Incense War: a Story of Price Discovery, Mayhem, and Lust

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in