<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rage, Song, and Shapeshift are all coming back</title>
	<atom:link href="http://critical-hits.com/2008/07/31/rage-song-and-shapeshift-are-all-coming-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://critical-hits.com/2008/07/31/rage-song-and-shapeshift-are-all-coming-back/</link>
	<description>The Journal of Gamer Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:53:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott&#8217;s Corner &#187; Archive &#187; Random gaming update</title>
		<link>http://critical-hits.com/2008/07/31/rage-song-and-shapeshift-are-all-coming-back/#comment-63197</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott&#8217;s Corner &#187; Archive &#187; Random gaming update</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 00:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.critical-hits.com/?p=1813#comment-63197</guid>
		<description>[...] from a Fey Pact Warlock. Earthdawn is being released as a 4e world setting Mount clarifications Chatty reports on the new catalog spilling that Players Handbook 2 will include Druid, Barbarian, Sorcerer, and Bard classes (eight [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from a Fey Pact Warlock. Earthdawn is being released as a 4e world setting Mount clarifications Chatty reports on the new catalog spilling that Players Handbook 2 will include Druid, Barbarian, Sorcerer, and Bard classes (eight [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Game</title>
		<link>http://critical-hits.com/2008/07/31/rage-song-and-shapeshift-are-all-coming-back/#comment-63196</link>
		<dc:creator>The Game</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.critical-hits.com/?p=1813#comment-63196</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the update, Rob!

Feel free to let us know what all is actually in the PHB2... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the update, Rob!</p>
<p>Feel free to let us know what all is actually in the PHB2&#8230; <img src='http://critical-hits.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Heinsoo</title>
		<link>http://critical-hits.com/2008/07/31/rage-song-and-shapeshift-are-all-coming-back/#comment-63195</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Heinsoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.critical-hits.com/?p=1813#comment-63195</guid>
		<description>As The Game began to suspect, there&#039;s no Swordmage in PH2.

I bet I know where the mix-up came from: the Swordmage *is* supported in the Arcane Power book, also announced in this Spring 2009 catalog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As The Game began to suspect, there&#8217;s no Swordmage in PH2.</p>
<p>I bet I know where the mix-up came from: the Swordmage *is* supported in the Arcane Power book, also announced in this Spring 2009 catalog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Game</title>
		<link>http://critical-hits.com/2008/07/31/rage-song-and-shapeshift-are-all-coming-back/#comment-63194</link>
		<dc:creator>The Game</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.critical-hits.com/?p=1813#comment-63194</guid>
		<description>Despite the fact that I reported this, I&#039;m dubious as to the Swordmage being in there. The others are pretty well confirmed, but I think there may be some mix-up there. Will followup on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite the fact that I reported this, I&#8217;m dubious as to the Swordmage being in there. The others are pretty well confirmed, but I think there may be some mix-up there. Will followup on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bartoneus</title>
		<link>http://critical-hits.com/2008/07/31/rage-song-and-shapeshift-are-all-coming-back/#comment-63193</link>
		<dc:creator>Bartoneus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.critical-hits.com/?p=1813#comment-63193</guid>
		<description>Russ:  Yea but August 2008 vs. Spring 2009 will probably sell a bunch of people on the FR book anyway.  Like my player (Joshx0rfz) who will most likely hit level 3 before the Spring!   :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ:  Yea but August 2008 vs. Spring 2009 will probably sell a bunch of people on the FR book anyway.  Like my player (Joshx0rfz) who will most likely hit level 3 before the Spring!   <img src='http://critical-hits.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ</title>
		<link>http://critical-hits.com/2008/07/31/rage-song-and-shapeshift-are-all-coming-back/#comment-63192</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.critical-hits.com/?p=1813#comment-63192</guid>
		<description>I think the best thing about this model is it allows the to build out rather than up. No one wants a supplement arms race and there are still plenty of classes/power sources to cover.

It is also interesting that the Swordmage is included. No need to buy the Forgotten Realms Players guide for only that now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the best thing about this model is it allows the to build out rather than up. No one wants a supplement arms race and there are still plenty of classes/power sources to cover.</p>
<p>It is also interesting that the Swordmage is included. No need to buy the Forgotten Realms Players guide for only that now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Porter</title>
		<link>http://critical-hits.com/2008/07/31/rage-song-and-shapeshift-are-all-coming-back/#comment-63191</link>
		<dc:creator>Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.critical-hits.com/?p=1813#comment-63191</guid>
		<description>Unsurprising really.

I mean what did people think?  That WotC would release a giant volume like the old Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay - with the players rules, game masters rules, monsters, and setting all in one book?

Their goal - as far as I can tell - was to release a _core_ set of rules that functioned well, and formed a reliable framework on which to build.

It&#039;ll be interesting to see if with the PHB2 whether or not the classes continue to conform with the 4 core combat roles:  Controller, Defender, Leader, Striker - or whether they&#039;ll add a couple more to round things out.  I&#039;m thinking that Druids will likely end up as Controllers, Barbarians as Defenders (with more mobility), Sorcerers as Strikers, Bards as Leaders, and Swordmages as Strikers.

Unless (and this is a big unless) they decide to expand the roles to match the ones found in the monster manual.  In Which case I can easily see Barbarians as Brutes, and Sorcerers as Artillery, and Swordmages as Skirmishers.

I think however, the PHB could have been around 50% to 100% bigger with the base classes alone having more than the 3 - 4 powers at each level to choose from.  That&#039;s just me though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unsurprising really.</p>
<p>I mean what did people think?  That WotC would release a giant volume like the old Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay &#8211; with the players rules, game masters rules, monsters, and setting all in one book?</p>
<p>Their goal &#8211; as far as I can tell &#8211; was to release a _core_ set of rules that functioned well, and formed a reliable framework on which to build.</p>
<p>It&#8217;ll be interesting to see if with the PHB2 whether or not the classes continue to conform with the 4 core combat roles:  Controller, Defender, Leader, Striker &#8211; or whether they&#8217;ll add a couple more to round things out.  I&#8217;m thinking that Druids will likely end up as Controllers, Barbarians as Defenders (with more mobility), Sorcerers as Strikers, Bards as Leaders, and Swordmages as Strikers.</p>
<p>Unless (and this is a big unless) they decide to expand the roles to match the ones found in the monster manual.  In Which case I can easily see Barbarians as Brutes, and Sorcerers as Artillery, and Swordmages as Skirmishers.</p>
<p>I think however, the PHB could have been around 50% to 100% bigger with the base classes alone having more than the 3 &#8211; 4 powers at each level to choose from.  That&#8217;s just me though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

