<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Feet of Clay</title>
	<atom:link href="http://critical-hits.com/2007/01/07/review-feet-of-clay/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://critical-hits.com/2007/01/07/review-feet-of-clay/</link>
	<description>The Journal of Gamer Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 17:14:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Game</title>
		<link>http://critical-hits.com/2007/01/07/review-feet-of-clay/#comment-59057</link>
		<dc:creator>The Game</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 19:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.critical-hits.com/?p=533#comment-59057</guid>
		<description>Small Gods is excellent (there&#039;s those cultural parallels for ya) and I agree totally, Monstrous Regiment is quite weak compared to the others. It took me a long time to finally finish that one, though the conclusion saved it a little bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Small Gods is excellent (there&#8217;s those cultural parallels for ya) and I agree totally, Monstrous Regiment is quite weak compared to the others. It took me a long time to finally finish that one, though the conclusion saved it a little bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joshx0rfz</title>
		<link>http://critical-hits.com/2007/01/07/review-feet-of-clay/#comment-59056</link>
		<dc:creator>joshx0rfz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 23:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.critical-hits.com/?p=533#comment-59056</guid>
		<description>Good Omens is an excellent collaborative effort between Neil Gaman and Terry Pratchett. My favorite discworld novel is Small Gods. The only one that has dissapointed me is Monstrous Regiment, all the rest have been a good read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Omens is an excellent collaborative effort between Neil Gaman and Terry Pratchett. My favorite discworld novel is Small Gods. The only one that has dissapointed me is Monstrous Regiment, all the rest have been a good read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Game</title>
		<link>http://critical-hits.com/2007/01/07/review-feet-of-clay/#comment-59055</link>
		<dc:creator>The Game</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 16:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.critical-hits.com/?p=533#comment-59055</guid>
		<description>Good choice, as I may have mentioned before, Night Watch is my absolute favorite among all of Prachett&#039;s books. Without giving anything away, it features some of my favorite storytelling devices, and reveals Ankh-Morpork&#039;s history as never before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good choice, as I may have mentioned before, Night Watch is my absolute favorite among all of Prachett&#8217;s books. Without giving anything away, it features some of my favorite storytelling devices, and reveals Ankh-Morpork&#8217;s history as never before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elena99</title>
		<link>http://critical-hits.com/2007/01/07/review-feet-of-clay/#comment-59054</link>
		<dc:creator>Elena99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 15:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.critical-hits.com/?p=533#comment-59054</guid>
		<description>I accidentally put the rating as 3.5, now it&#039;s 4.

It&#039;s good to hear that most of the series is like this. I&#039;m reading Night Watch now, and I&#039;m on the look out for more. There seems to be a lot of them at the library.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I accidentally put the rating as 3.5, now it&#8217;s 4.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s good to hear that most of the series is like this. I&#8217;m reading Night Watch now, and I&#8217;m on the look out for more. There seems to be a lot of them at the library.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Game</title>
		<link>http://critical-hits.com/2007/01/07/review-feet-of-clay/#comment-59053</link>
		<dc:creator>The Game</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 15:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.critical-hits.com/?p=533#comment-59053</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a huge Terry Pratchett fan, and I reread this one recently as it leads into &quot;Going Postal&quot;, one of the newer novels. Not only does &quot;Feet of Clay&quot; age well as far as being up to the consistently high quality of the series, it lays the groundwork for changes in the culture of Ankh-Morpork, and every new book manages to use Fantasy as a mirror to current issues. Also, it&#039;s easy to pick up nearly any book in the series without having to read any previous book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a huge Terry Pratchett fan, and I reread this one recently as it leads into &#8220;Going Postal&#8221;, one of the newer novels. Not only does &#8220;Feet of Clay&#8221; age well as far as being up to the consistently high quality of the series, it lays the groundwork for changes in the culture of Ankh-Morpork, and every new book manages to use Fantasy as a mirror to current issues. Also, it&#8217;s easy to pick up nearly any book in the series without having to read any previous book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

